The End of Flavored Blunts?
June 24, 2009 Posted in News-ish

Yesterday, President Obama signed into law a anti-tobacco bill, which will make the distribution of flavored cigarettes illegal. The law is intended to limit tobacco products being “marketed to children”, but this could also signal the end to something any pot smoker holds dear: flavored blunts.
Now, the wording of the bill seems to specifically target “cigarettes,” not cigars or tobacco wraps. But it doesn’t take much to imagine a judge ruling that flavored cigars and tobacco wraps qualify just as much as cigarettes do. And if that happens, it will be a sad day in Pot Town. Here’s what the bill says:
1) RESTRICTIONS ON DESCRIPTORS USED IN MARKETING OF CIGARETTES-
(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), no person shall use, with respect to any cigarette brand style commercially distributed domestically, on the portion of the package of such cigarette brand style that customarily is visible to consumers before purchase, or in advertising of such cigarette brand style any of the following as a descriptor of any cigarette brand style–
(i) the name of any candy or fruit;
(ii) the word ‘candy,’ ‘citrus,’ ‘cream,’ ‘fruit,’ ‘sugar,’ ‘sweet,’ ‘tangy,’ or ‘tart,’; or
(iii) any extension or variation of any of the words ‘candy,’ ‘citrus,’ ‘cream,’ ‘fruit,’ ‘sugar,’ ‘sweet,’ ‘tangy,’ or ‘tart,’ including but not limited to ‘creamy,’ or ‘fruity.’
(B) LIMITATION- Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the use of the following words or to any extension or variation of any of them: ‘coffee,’ ‘mint,’ and ‘menthol’.
(C) SCENTED MATERIALS- No person shall use, in the advertising or labeling of any cigarette commercially distributed domestically, any scented materials, except in an adult-only facility.
(D) DEFINITIONS- In this section:
(i) The term ‘candy’ means a confection made from sugar or sugar substitute, including any confection identified generically or by brand, and shall include the words ‘cacao,’ ‘chocolate,’ ‘cinnamon,’ ‘cocoa,’ ‘honey,’ ‘licorice,’ ‘maple,’ ‘mocha,’ and ‘vanilla.’
(ii) The term ‘fruit’ means any fruit identified by generic name, type, or variety, including but not limited to ‘apple,’ ‘banana,’ ‘cherry,’ and ‘orange.’ The term ‘fruit’ does not include words that identify seeds, nuts or peppers, or types or varieties thereof or words that are extensions or variations of such words.” [via: GovTrack]

Have an Amazing V-Day
10 Commandments of Casual Sex
Hot Girls Take a Good Photo
Would She Pull a Scarlett Johansson?
Keira Knightle Reminds You Why You Lust Her
This is Our Birthday Cake
Arianny Celeste Throws in the Towel
Puppy Conan Should Happen Ever
Stars Who Got Revenge on Their Ex
Sexiest Things in America
How to Beat Popular Game Show
Why Candice Swanpoel is Our Favorite Angel

The Campus Socialites go with the Vanilla Dutch! It would be a crying shame to lose that…
Find out more about Campus Socialites at http://www.TheCampusSocialite.com
as long as rillos are still made i think we can make it but it is a nice thing to be able to change the flavor a little bit dont get me wrong i love my flavored blunts but all in all they taste the same they taste like the sticky goodness you put in them
In my opinion, there's a loophole that I see in this law. If the makers would just repackage to not to advertise that is it a "fruity" cigarette it should be fine. Makers can take advantage of this loophole and we can still have the cigars and cigarillos that we know and love.
I think that as an American citizen, i should be allowed to choose what type and flavor of cigarette i please. It is just another limit to our rights in this so called "free' country. Even though i am a supporter of President Obama, i think that it is a bit hypocritical of him to take such a large step when he himself is a cigarette smoker. And whether or not they are marked to kids, they cant buy them till they are 18 anyway. Bad move Obama!
Thank you Obama, for taking away our individual rights.
Obama finally does something….. and it sux.
What an ass