Comments on: 5 Things Rachel Maddow Should Consider to Conceal Her Adam’s Apple

By: Taylor

Taylor — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:39:52 +0000

I am not exaggerating when I say you are probably the most retarded person on the planet. I AM NOT KIDDING.
Rachel is perfect. She is everything that a perfect human being is. She is like Heaven sent down to our computer screens. She is an Angel that takes your breath away. Type in “perfect” into google and click on images, and her face is the first to show up. No skeletal, big-jugged supermodel has anything on her cuz she kicks all of their asses with her perfect dimensions and proportions. Her sexy boyish side makes you want to explode from lustful desire. Her adorable grin makes you unconsciously stick your hands down your pants during the news. She is the reason my crotch tingles anytime I hear the words “top story.” And I love her Adam’s apple. I would suck on her Adam’s apple and any other part of her body she asked me to all day long, til my tongue and lips and cheeks were numb from sheer happiness.
So if you can’t see that, little retarded pal, you deserve to be euthanized.

By: Dick Stone

Dick Stone — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:28:40 +0000

I find Rachel to be the finest commentator on TV or radio. Though she covers much of the same territory as most news/talk shows, she always seems to find the actual truth of the tale rather then the hyperbole.
For the record: Rachel has said she would prefer to wear a t-shirt, jeans and her black rimmed glasses but concedes to the dull jacket as a way of taking her look out of the conversation. Judging by this article she may as well go with her personal style and drop the jacket. With children like you guys lasering in on any imperfection —- f’ing hilarious, Elizabethan Neck-Poof Thing!!!!

By: COED Magazine101 Things To Be Thankful For During Economic Armageddon «

COED Magazine101 Things To Be Thankful For During Economic Armageddon « — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:55:13 +0000

[...] No-Fee ATMs 87. Rachel Maddow: Because Keith Olbermann is really getting on our nerves these days. [...]

By: Noel Roberts

Noel Roberts — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:55:26 +0000

You know,.. I’ve only caught her show a few times and am not a fan, but your quite a superficial, judgemental and mean person to be saying all this stuff about her. I don’t find your five suggestions funny either. I don’t look for flaws in people, and think I’m better than everyone. I was too preoccupied with thinking about what she’s done to make herself attractive to msnbc viewers. I’m sure she looks better than your arrogant mug.

later man..

By: Noel Roberts

Noel Roberts — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:35:39 +0000

Quote from this article’s author:

“For some poor reason, they’ve decided to box her in a long-necked, wide coat that makes her appear she completely naked under her blazer – and not in a good way.”

What in the world do you mean by, “not in a good way?” – She’s a woman and is kinda cute, and I’m sure has smooth skin/nice breasts under there. So what’s not good about that???

Ha! Well,You must be attracted to men, whatever gender/preference you are/have:) That’s fine, but as a straight man, I think her wordrobe choice is cool! I like looking at her completely unadorned and plunging neckline;) – As you have said it makes me also think about her being naked under the coat, but that is a pleasureable thought to me – and in a good way.

If she wasn’t always wearing the blouse underneath that you can see towards the bottom of of the v shaped neckline it would be even more sexy.

Who cares about her small Adams Apple, my college Biology studies say that it is commom in a small percentage of females – so what & who cares really? When a woman’s dress can make you think about her “being completely naked under her blazer” and at the same time not be at all revealing and in this case just showing some skin on her neck & chest in a low neckline – that is a classy woman. A little bit of skin showing on a female goes a long way in coveying her attractiveness and does so in a professional manner.

I hope she continues to wear these blazers with the plunging neckline, and hopefully will forget to wear a blouse underneath sometime!

Also, I didn’t even really notice the adams apple till you brought it up as I wasn’t even thinking about that after I was trying to see how far down the “V” neckline goes(under all the damn graphics) and if she was indeed wearing a blouse.

BTW- Doesn’t Jane Spinner on Fox mornings wear similar stuff but not show quite as much skin?? -she’s awesome too.

Late.

By: Gleek

Gleek — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:58:27 +0000

If she has a MALE anatomical feature like an adam’s apple, she mae be a he-she (hermaphrodite). I bet she has both male and female sex organs.

By: TK

TK — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:29:46 +0000

I was wondering when it became a negative to be “educated.” I mean, isn’t that the aim? Isn’t that what we all want to be? When did it become acceptable to revel in not being educated?

Does she lean left? Definitely. But to make fun of her for being educated. Come on.

By: Terry

Terry — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:26:24 +0000

“Her analysis is tempered and even-handed. All in all, she’s a refreshing voice in a grimy mud puddle of political blather.”
Are you serious? This is bordering on the most ridiculous thing ever said. Tempered? Even-handed? She spews rhetoric every time her mouth opens and you can visibly see the hate for every “non-educated, narrow-minded, simpleton” in her eyes.

By: bowlwoman

bowlwoman — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:35:14 +0000

Too bad that’s an Elizabethan neck poof-thing and not Victorian…or maybe we should call it a “fleurchon?”