Comments on: FHM Vs Maxim Model Showdown

By: The 10 Sexiest MMA Ring Girls « Celebrity Freaks

The 10 Sexiest MMA Ring Girls « Celebrity Freaks — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:34 +0000

[...] featured the 26 year old California native and current Octagon Girl / Host of UFC All Access in our FHM vs. Maxim Model Showdown in September 2008. One year later, we highlighted her attributes again, this time as our Daily Snapshot. She’s [...]

By: 26 Most Beautiful MMA Ring Girls : COED Magazine

26 Most Beautiful MMA Ring Girls : COED Magazine — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:42:53 +0000

By: katie

katie — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:47:02 +0000

im a girl but thought i would comment these mags are rubbish there all about fake boobs and air brushing they need to start using real woman and noooo air brishing check out my site guys at http://www.aclassmodels.com

contact me fru ther to let me know what you think!

By: Mel B is absolutely gorgeous in bikini | Scoop Celebrity

Mel B is absolutely gorgeous in bikini | Scoop Celebrity — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:35:09 +0000

[...] FHM Vs Maxim Model Showdown [...]

By: SilentSoze

SilentSoze — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:10:22 +0000

Both magazines suck. Both use to be something almost a decade ago. I mean they had something back then that you couldn't deny. I mean we were passing Maxim's and FHM's around the barricks when i was in the military, not Playboys and Hustlers. But the content has gone to shit since then, both are a joke, one is barely a magazine anymore, yet charges almost six bucks an issue. And the pictures suck. The best picture is the first picture, and its always on a two sheet spread, so you can take it out of the magazine. And even though this "vs" might show you decent ass shots, neither really show any ass shots, even if they were doing a pictorial on J-Lo or Fergie or someone else known for flaunting their money maker to get your attention. Both of these magazines are trash now. They use to be more popular than Playboy, sad but true.

By: Vic

Vic — Mon, 25 May 2009 03:16:10 +0000

@ Trey says:

Fri, 5th Sep 2008 12:43 pm

FHM is British ánd mainstream.

And second: It's not about the square inches of nude you moron, it's about who got the best / sexiest / unexpected pictures. You can find nude and porn anywhere.

By: vince

vince — Sat, 23 May 2009 00:17:54 +0000

I like this comparison. fhm wins easily.

in response to typical.. its not about which picture has less clothing. its about which picture shows the person to be more attractive. theres lots of factors. lighting, color, type of clothing, angle, etc. for example carmen electra. she has less clothing in the maxim but she shows sign of age which is less attractive to me than the fhm. so i chose fhm since they showed her curves and wat not without any showing anything negative.

By: Everything’s fine when you listen to the D-O-G | Dave's Pub & Grub

Tue, 19 May 2009 01:24:25 +0000

[...] Who ya got? FHM v MAXIM [...]

By: Zanmato

Zanmato — Sun, 17 May 2009 06:09:37 +0000

Maxim is no more in the UK anyway, the last printed issue this month then it's all online from then, like FHM is in the US. Both mags have gone completely downhill over the past couple of years anyway, less A-list celebrities wearing little to B and C-list celebrities wearing more.

By: splat

splat — Sun, 17 May 2009 03:20:03 +0000

FHM wins for sure. I am, however, sick of all the airbrushing crap that they do in these mags. Makes em all look the same. I want to see some real women!