<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Smaller Boobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coedmagazine.com/2008/06/23/in-defense-of-smaller-boobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/06/23/in-defense-of-smaller-boobs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Black</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/06/23/in-defense-of-smaller-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-65757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coedmagazine.com/?p=49082#comment-65757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has to be one of the worst defensive arguments in the history of all time. As far as #2 goes, yea I&#039;m pretty sure, just you. There is an extreme disregard for good taste in the phrasing &quot;spastic Muppets&quot;, which should be rephrased as &quot;graceful, bouncing, luscious breasts.&quot; To even compare breasts to, of all things Muppets (wish I could italicize that word), truly requires a depraved mind. Moreover, the entire essay provided sounds like you&#039;re trying to preach to a crowd of eighteen-year-old celibate mormons. Back pain? Forty years old? Jesus! It&#039;s like Father Nosex is trying to talk to me about the evil of big boobs. Not one single mention that all boobs have more or less the same number of nerve endings in them, leaving smaller boobs more sensitive. Not a single mention that smaller boobs have far less a chance of having CD sized areola/crappy nipples. Not one mention smaller boobs are easier to put in the mouth. Appalling. 
 
Now I love big ol&#039; tits, truly I do, but I like all tits all the same. My preference is surely big tits, however, I would never consider such a thing a deal breaker. I am much more offended by how sophomoric this article is, far more than the subject. Perhaps if this was on newadvent.org I could applaud such a piece. However, I feel this effort grossly misplaced. The closing statement sucks as well as the moral. Especially the closing sentence. Aside from &#039;sweater muffins&#039;, go to hell.  
 
Respectfully submitted, etc. etc. 
- Tom Black ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the worst defensive arguments in the history of all time. As far as #2 goes, yea I&#039;m pretty sure, just you. There is an extreme disregard for good taste in the phrasing &quot;spastic Muppets&quot;, which should be rephrased as &quot;graceful, bouncing, luscious breasts.&quot; To even compare breasts to, of all things Muppets (wish I could italicize that word), truly requires a depraved mind. Moreover, the entire essay provided sounds like you&#039;re trying to preach to a crowd of eighteen-year-old celibate mormons. Back pain? Forty years old? Jesus! It&#039;s like Father Nosex is trying to talk to me about the evil of big boobs. Not one single mention that all boobs have more or less the same number of nerve endings in them, leaving smaller boobs more sensitive. Not a single mention that smaller boobs have far less a chance of having CD sized areola/crappy nipples. Not one mention smaller boobs are easier to put in the mouth. Appalling.</p>
<p>Now I love big ol&#039; tits, truly I do, but I like all tits all the same. My preference is surely big tits, however, I would never consider such a thing a deal breaker. I am much more offended by how sophomoric this article is, far more than the subject. Perhaps if this was on newadvent.org I could applaud such a piece. However, I feel this effort grossly misplaced. The closing statement sucks as well as the moral. Especially the closing sentence. Aside from &#039;sweater muffins&#039;, go to hell. </p>
<p>Respectfully submitted, etc. etc.</p>
<p>- Tom Black </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A, B, C&#8230; DD? &#124; FAQ Women</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/06/23/in-defense-of-smaller-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-56091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A, B, C&#8230; DD? &#124; FAQ Women]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coedmagazine.com/?p=49082#comment-56091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bazzongafílicos) los que le encontramos la gracia a un formato más petite. Pero a diferencia de este artículo, nunca diría que las grandes son inmanejables, ni me importa que a los 40 bajen hasta [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bazzongafílicos) los que le encontramos la gracia a un formato más petite. Pero a diferencia de este artículo, nunca diría que las grandes son inmanejables, ni me importa que a los 40 bajen hasta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

