Even from a purely literary standpoint, this is in no way a great article. In addition, the poster seems to have interpreted "3" as being equal to "100." There we go, we've established unreliability.

I can't tell you how tired I am of people complaining about the "double standard." You know what a double standard is? Men have dicks and women have vaginas. There's a double standard for you. Here's another one – women who sleep around are sluts, men who sleep around are studs. Wake up and smell the sexual politics – the male counterparts to sluts are losers/40-year-old virgins. One of these days people are gonna realize there's a reason we don't put women in men's prisons – men and women are different, and should be judged according to different standards.

That being said, sleep around all you want – the only thing you're hurting is your marriageability.

theres nothing wrong with girl/guy enjoying sex some people have different views. just dont get all pissed and start calling people out(CRAIG) when a goody girl/guy doesnt click with a *slutty* girl/guy.

I guess the whole "getting close to someone you hardly know" thing really gets to me, and yeah I lose respect for someone if they do it a lot.

That goes for guys and girls.

In Jason's mind (and men like him), any woman who is sexually empowered is a threat and he/they will do anything they can to push them down.

What is wrong with enjoying sex? Nothing. What is wrong with seeking sex? Nothing. Being in tune with ones sexuality is not superficial or immature. In fact, it is quite the opposite.

I applaud the author for creating this post and I hope the plethora of ridiculous comments by even more ridiculous people are something that she can ignore.

Kudos, Sady