Don't believe me, go read your fucking policy moron, I damn well fucking guaranteee it is in there.

Try telling the fucking truth would ya?

Joey – she didnt STEAL anything. You pay into an insurance policy for that very reason. So am i to assume that if NOTHING happened to her, she should get all of her years of insurance premiums back?

Of course not, that is not how insurance works. By the same token, Policy underwriters are taking the gamble that nothing will happen to you. If you got into an accident, utilized insurance policies and then received a settlement, your insurance company would have NO standing to recover from you. Why should Wal-Mart be any different…STEAL? come on.

Back to you Caroline – there was a time where employers took pride in taking care of their employees, because of companies like Wal-Mart – those days have ended.

Furthermore, as for the "retard" usage, if you followed through the links that go through CNN and into Reuters, you will see that one of the Wal-Mart VPs was quoted as referencing her as "a retard."

Thanks for the comments, I know the writing is crass, but i thought the satire would come through.

Walmart was screwed out of money.

This poor woman was screwed out of her health but she received compensation for it and that compensation was supposed to pay for medical bills. Unfortunately, it was not enough to cover them.

The trucking company paid for their part so technically, they are square.

The lawyers took a ton of money that per their fees that this woman agreed to they were entitled. It makes me want to puke that they were entitled to it, but they were.

This leaves Walmart with money owed to them and a woman who spent that money. Walmart can donate the money to her, which would be a wonderful deed and something many of us would do, but they shouldn't have to.

As Caroline points out, the lawyers took most of the money. They are the bad guys even though they are legit. Debbie Shank can blame herself for working with these lawyers or she can blame her lawyers for not winning her more money.

Let me make that more clear. It's money that WALMART has no moral right to. Obviously the Shanks deserve it.

But let's not forget the Shank lawyers involved here. The Shanks got a $900,000 settlement from the trucking firm. Guess where half of it went? And now Walmart wants the other half.

Yes, WALMART is a bloodsucker, but not because of their wage scale. The PROBLEM here is that Walmart is suing this woman – and no she is not retarded you stupid piece of crap – for insurance money that morally they have no right to. It's a different issue entirely.