<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Statutory Rape Ads are Creepy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-79198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-79198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lulz for the guy with the nazi grandparents. XD ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lulz for the guy with the nazi grandparents. XD </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shape of Things to Come [IV] &#171; The Celtic Rebel</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-10400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Shape of Things to Come [IV] &#171; The Celtic Rebel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-10400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] puberty (from wiki, so expect some disinfo). The above pics are from a [presumably] well-meaning yet severely misguided campaign to discourage viewing underage women as sexual objects (but what do you expect from today&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] puberty (from wiki, so expect some disinfo). The above pics are from a [presumably] well-meaning yet severely misguided campaign to discourage viewing underage women as sexual objects (but what do you expect from today&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shon</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-8356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PedoBEAR says, &quot;CCCCCCCCCCCombo-bbreaker!!!!&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PedoBEAR says, &quot;CCCCCCCCCCCombo-bbreaker!!!!&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-8342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amanda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-8342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[um, to all those people who think the law applies to an 18 year old and a 17 year old dating, you&#039;re basically wrong. there&#039;s always loopholes around laws. if you&#039;re together before one of them turns 18, then it&#039;s perfectly legal, and either way, no one is going to automatically know the difference between the 2 ages just looking at the couple. it would probably be thrown out in court just because it&#039;s a year difference, sometimes just a few days, weeks, or months. seriously people use some common sense. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, to all those people who think the law applies to an 18 year old and a 17 year old dating, you&#039;re basically wrong. there&#039;s always loopholes around laws. if you&#039;re together before one of them turns 18, then it&#039;s perfectly legal, and either way, no one is going to automatically know the difference between the 2 ages just looking at the couple. it would probably be thrown out in court just because it&#039;s a year difference, sometimes just a few days, weeks, or months. seriously people use some common sense. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blabla</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blabla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kid lovers F.u.! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kid lovers F.u.! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borat sagidev</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[borat sagidev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my country, this is what you call the Khazakstani dream. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my country, this is what you call the Khazakstani dream. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperMax</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperMax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I did was cover the head and praise the body. Does that still count as pedophilia in this situation? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I did was cover the head and praise the body. Does that still count as pedophilia in this situation? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jackson</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hold enough 2 pee old enough 4 me!!! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold enough 2 pee old enough 4 me!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WIN? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIN? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://coedmagazine.com/2008/02/05/these-new-statutory-rape-ads-are-creepy/comment-page-2/#comment-5603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coedmagazine.com/news/5501#comment-5603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bow chika bow wow oh wait thats what these ads are trying to stop guess they don&#039;t work. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bow chika bow wow oh wait thats what these ads are trying to stop guess they don&#039;t work. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

